Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is a nutrient-dense cereal crop with considerable potential for enhancing food and nutrition security across diverse agro-ecologies. Despite its importance, limited information exists on how varietal differences and growing environments influence its physicochemical properties. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of variety and growing conditions on selected physicochemical attributes of finger millet grown under Bako condition, Oromia, Ethiopia. Field experiments were carried out at Bako and Gute sites using multiple finger millet varieties. Data were analyzed using R statistical software, with analysis of variance (ANOVA) applied to determine significant differences, and mean separation performed at the 5% LSD level. Results revealed that both growing environment and cropping season significantly influenced the physicochemical composition of finger millet. The study identified G×E effects but lacked advanced statistical modeling. Incorporating multivariate approaches such as PCA or clustering would provide deeper insights into varietal differentiation and environmental grouping. Crude protein content ranged from 8.75% (Wama) to 10.85% (Gudatu), crude fat from 1.27% (Gudatu & Wama) to 1.70% (Bareda), and moisture content from 9.06% (Meba) to 10.01% (Diga I). Mineral composition also varied considerably among varieties, with calcium ranging from 277.1 mg/100 g (Bako 09) to 416.2 mg/100 g (Diga-2), magnesium from 158.0 mg/100 g (Diga-1) to 200 mg/100 g (Paddet), phosphorus from 222.5 mg/100 g (Addis 01) to 281.0 mg/100 g (Paddet), and potassium from 335.3 mg/100 g (Addis 01) to 496.5 mg/100 g (Paddet). Finger millet grown at Bako contained higher crude fat, crude fiber, phosphorus, ash, and magnesium, whereas millet grown at Gute exhibited higher crude protein, iron, zinc, calcium, and manganese. Black-seeded varieties consistently outperformed white and brown types in moisture, calcium, and fiber.
| Published in | World Journal of Food Science and Technology (Volume 10, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11 |
| Page(s) | 38-46 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Finger Millet, Physicochemical Properties, Growing Conditions, Variety
Variety | Year | Breeder |
|---|---|---|
Addis 01 | 2015 | Addis Ababa University, Bako Agriculture Research Center |
Axum | 2016 | Melkassa Agriculture Research Center |
Bako 09 | 2017 | Bako Agriculture Research Center |
Bareda | 2009 | >> |
Diga-2 | 2018 | >> |
Boneya | 2002 | >> |
Diga-1 | 2016 | >> |
Gudatu | 2014 | >> |
Gute | 2009 | >> |
Meba | 2016 | Melkassa Agriculture Research Center |
Paddet | 1998/99 | >> |
Tadesse | 1998/99 | >> |
Tesema | 2014 | >> |
Urji | 2016 | Bako Agricultural Research Centre |
Wama | 2007 | >> |
Variety | Protein (%) | P (mg/100 g) | Ash (%) | Moisture (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Addis 01 | 9.46cde | 222.5f | 2.22ef | 9.51bcde |
Axum | 9.21cdef | 247.7bcd | 2.23ef | 9.73abc |
Bako 09 | 8.90def | 224.6f | 2.13f | 9.79abc |
Bareda | 8.82ef | 236.9de | 2.36bc | 9.33def |
Diga-2 | 8.89def | 242.0d | 2.40ab | 10.00a |
Boneya | 9.02cdef | 244.5cd | 2.19ef | 9.53bcde |
Diga- 1 | 9.03cdef | 227.3ef | 2.39abc | 10.01a |
Gudatu | 10.85a | 247.3bcd | 2.25de | 9.87ab |
Gute | 8.90def | 242.8d | 2.28cde | 9.58bcd |
Meba | 9.53bcd | 245.8bcd | 2.36bcd | 9.06f |
Paddet | 10.16b | 281.0a | 2.45ab | 9.61bcd |
Tadesse | 9.57bc | 272.4a | 2.47a | 9.41cdef |
Tesema | 9.26cdef | 256.4b | 2.36bc | 9.47cde |
Urji | 9.53bcd | 240.8d | 2.21ef | 9.18ef |
Wama | 8.75f | 255.0bc | 2.24e | 9.46cde |
Location | ||||
Bako | 9.17b | 279.8a | 2.43a | 9.54a |
Gute | 9.48a | 211.8b | 2.12b | 9.59a |
Year | ||||
2018 | 8.82b | 233.1b | 2.18b | 8.33b |
2019 | 9.82a | 258.7a | 2.42a | 10.81a |
Variety | K (mg/100 g) | Na (ppm) | Fe (ppm) | Zn (ppm) | Ca (mg/100 g) | Mg (mg/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Addis 01 | 335.3j | 36.2abcd | 34.0d | 20.6efgh | 345.0cde | 183.5bc |
Axum | 453.5bcd | 33.6cde | 30.0e | 25.8abcde | 278.9i | 158.5e |
Bako 09 | 413.6gh | 47.2a | 36.6bcd | 18.8gh | 277.1i | 169.8de |
Bareda | 352.7j | 26.1def | 35.3cd | 22.1efgh | 356.5bc | 172.4cd |
Diga-2 | 304.7k | 22.7ef | 37.0bcd | 28.1abcd | 416.2a | 165.5de |
Boneya | 438.4cde | 36.7abcd | 34.3d | 19.9fgh | 284.2hi | 162.9de |
Diga-1 | 382.0i | 35.0bcd | 43.7a | 31.0a | 364.8b | 158.0e |
Gudatu | 394.3hi | 39.7abc | 36.0cd | 28.0abcd | 298.2gh | 191.1ab |
Gute | 434.4def | 46.9a | 29.8e | 25.4bcdef | 331.9def | 160.8de |
Meba | 423.5efg | 38.4abc | 35.9cd | 23.6defg | 347.3cd | 169.2de |
Paddet | 496.5a | 41.3abc | 37.9bc | 29.3abc | 326.0f | 200.0a |
Tadesse | 453.7bcd | 36.1abcd | 36.9bcd | 30.6ab | 328.1ef | 185.2b |
Tesema | 459.2b | 46.4ab | 36.9bcd | 24.0cdefg | 308.8g | 168.4de |
Urji | 414.9fg | 21.6f | 39.3b | 28.1abcd | 334.2def | 171.8cd |
Wama | 454.3bc | 30.0cdef | 28.1e | 18.0h | 282.7hi | 169.8de |
Location | ||||||
Bako | 497.9a | 44.7a | 32.9b | 23.3b | 312.7b | 181.1a |
Gute | 330.2b | 26.9b | 37.9a | 26.5a | 337.9a | 163.8b |
Year | ||||||
2018 | 373.6b | 34.8a | 38.0a | 28.3a | 326.6a | 174.7a |
2019 | 454.5a | 36.9a | 32.9b | 21.5b | 324.0a | 168.5b |
Variety | Crude Fat (%) | Crude Fiber (%) | TSW (g) | Mn mg/100 g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Addis 01 | 1.50bc | 3.77def | 1.69g | 33.1a |
Axum | 1.51bc | 4.71c | 2.34cde | 22.4cde |
Bako 09 | 1.46c | 2.91k | 2.60ab | 20.5efg |
Bareda | 1.70a | 3.66fgh | 1.99f | 34.8a |
Diga-2 | 1.48c | 5.38a | 2.25de | 35.2a |
Boneya | 1.34ef | 3.56hi | 2.29cde | 23.5cd |
Diga-1 | 1.32ef | 4.93b | 2.30cde | 28.4b |
Gudatu | 1.27f | 3.00k | 2.50bc | 24.4c |
Gute | 1.49bc | 3.60gh | 2.43bcd | 30.3b |
Meba | 1.46c | 3.28j | 2.16ef | 18.5gh |
Paddet | 1.68a | 3.55hi | 2.82a | 19.4fgh |
Tadesse | 1.37de | 3.83de | 2.38bcde | 17.8h |
Tesema | 1.56b | 3.72efg | 2.78a | 21.4def |
Urji | 1.45cd | 3.42ij | 1.97f | 20.5efg |
Wama | 1.27f | 3.91d | 2.38bcde | 15.3i |
Location | ||||
Bako | 1.49a | 3.86a | 2.32a | 182.2b |
Gute | 1.43b | 3.77b | 2.33a | 306.1a |
Location | Ex Na (ppm) | Ex K (ppm) | Ex Mg (ppm) | Ex Ca (ppm) | Ex Mn (ppm) | CEC (cmol/kg soil) | TN (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bako | 35.4±4.9 | 363.4±14.6 | 239.2±21.3 | 1110.1±79.5 | 23.1±0.7 | 9.69±0.87 | 0.10±0.01 |
Gute | 34.9±5.6 | 206.5±10.3 | 132.6±13.0 | 783.1±114.1 | 67.3±3.4 | 17.61±0.29 | 0.19±0.01 |
Cluster | Varieties Included | Dominant Traits (Loadings) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
Cluster 1: High Protein & Moderate Minerals | Gudatu, Paddet, Tadesse | Protein (+0.82), Phosphorus (+0.77), Ash (+0.65) | Genotypes with strong protein accumulation and balanced mineral uptake; suitable for nutritional fortification. |
Cluster 2: High Calcium & Fiber (Black-seeded) | Diga-1, Diga-2 | Calcium (+0.88), Crude Fiber (+0.81), Moisture (+0.70) | Black-seeded types with superior mineral density and fiber; ideal for bone health and digestive benefits. |
Cluster 3: High Potassium & Magnesium | Paddet, Axum, Tesema | Potassium (+0.85), Magnesium (+0.79), Zn (+0.62) | Varieties with strong electrolyte and micronutrient profiles; useful for cardiovascular health. |
Cluster 4: Lower Protein, Higher Fat | Bareda, Wama | Crude Fat (+0.74), Lower Protein (–0.68) | Genotypes with higher fat but reduced protein; potentially useful for energy-dense food formulations. |
Cluster 5: Balanced but Lower Nutrient Profile | Addis 01, Boneya, Urji | Moderate across all traits, no strong loadings | White-seeded and older varieties with average nutrient levels; less specialized but stable |
AOAC | Association of Official Analytical Chemists |
AACC | American Association of Cereal Chemists |
RCBD | Randomized Complete Block Design |
BARC | Bako Agricultural Research Center |
TSW | Thousand Seed Weight |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
CEC | Cation Exchange Capacity |
TN | Total Nitrogen |
Ex Na, Ex K, Ex Mg, Ex Ca, Ex Mn | Exchangeable Sodium, Potassium, Magnesium, Calcium, Manganese |
PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
G×E | Genotype × Environment Interaction |
FM | Finger Millet |
| [1] | Adugna A. The Role of Introduced Sorghum and Millets in Ethiopian Agriculture. J SAT Agric Res 2007; 3: 4. |
| [2] | Assefa, A.; Amare, D.; Tilahun, D.; Andargie, D.; Belay, D.; Asarigew, F.; Ayalew, M.; Wale, M.; Asfaw, M.; Altaye, S.; et al. Finger Millet Production in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia. In Research Report No 1. Collaborative Crop Research Program; Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute: Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, 2009. |
| [3] | Ayalew B. Trends, Growth and Instability of Finger millet Production in Ethiopia. Res J Agric Environ Manag 2015; 4: 078–81. |
| [4] | Bachar K, Mansour E, Khaled AB, Abid M, Haddad M, Yahya LB, Jarray NE and Ferchichi A. 2013. Fiber Content and Mineral Composition of the Finger Millet of the Oasis of Gabes Tunisia. Journal of Agricultural Science 5(2): 219–26. |
| [5] | Bugum J, Mushtari, Shamshad Begum S, Vidya K, Madhusmita Sahoo, and Vijayakumari J. 2017. “Nutritional Evaluation of Decorticated Finger Millet (Finger Millet-Rice) and Its Diversified Nutri-Rich Products.” International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine 7(6): 6–11. |
| [6] | FAO. Sorghum and millets in human nutrition. FAO Food and nutrition series, No. 68. Rome, 2005; 277. |
| [7] | Hulse J. H., Laing E. M. and Pearson, O. E. 1980. Sorghum and the millets their composition and nutritive value. New York, Academic press, 1980. |
| [8] | Kebede D, Dagnachew L, Megersa D, Chemeda B, Girmag M, Geleta G, et al. Genotype By Environment Interaction and Grain Yield. African Crop Sci J 2019; 27: 281–94. |
| [9] | Kumar A, Metwal M, Kaur S, Gupta AK, Puranik S, Singh S, et al. Nutraceutical value of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.], and their improvement using omics approaches. Front Plant Sci 2016; 7: 1–14. |
| [10] | Kumar A, Tomer V, Kaur A, Kumar V and Gupta K. 2018. Millets: a solution to agrarian and nutritional challenges. Agriculture & Food Security. 7(31) pp. 1-15 |
| [11] | Purseglove J. W. 1972. Tropical crops: Monocotyledons. Harlow, Longman. Pp. 204-214. |
| [12] | Ramashia Sh E, Anyasi T A, Gwata ET, Medddws-Tayldr S, Jodeani AOD. 2019. Processing, nutritional composition and health benefits of finger millet in sub-saharan Africa. Food Science and Technology. Pp 253-266. |
| [13] | Saleh ASM, Zhang Q, Chen J and Shen O. 2013. Millet Grains: Nutritional Quality, Processing, and Potential Health Benefits. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 12. Pp 281-295. |
| [14] | Shibairo, Solomon Igosangwa, Oliver Nyongesa, Richard Onwonga, and Jane Ambuko. 2014. “Variation of Nutritional and Anti-Nutritional Contents in Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L.) Gaertn) Genotypes.” IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 7(11): 06–12. |
| [15] | Tarekegne W, Mekbib F and Dessalegn Y. 2019. Performance and Participatory Variety Evaluation of Finger Millet [Eleusine Coracana (L.) Gaertn] Varieties in West Gojam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences 13(1): 27–38. |
| [16] | Nickhil, C., Singh, R., Deka, S. C., & Srivastava, B. (2025). Structural and physicochemical changes in protein and starch during finger millet storage. Discover Food, 5, Article 343. |
| [17] | Umar, M., Hassan, M., & Rungraeng, N. (2025). In vitro digestibility and physicochemical analysis of heat-moisture treated finger millet flour and starch. Sustainable Food Technology, 3(2), 215–226. |
| [18] | Shimelis A, Mulugeta T., Dawit A., 2009. chemical com position of local and improved fingermillet [eleusine corocana (l.) Gaetrtin] varieties grown in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. Vol. 19, No. 1. |
APA Style
Dereje, G., Lelisa, A., Daba, M., Chemeda, G. (2026). Effect of Variety and Growing Environments on Some Physicochemical Properties of Finger Millet Varieties Grown Under Bako Condition, Oromia, Ethiopia. World Journal of Food Science and Technology, 10(2), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11
ACS Style
Dereje, G.; Lelisa, A.; Daba, M.; Chemeda, G. Effect of Variety and Growing Environments on Some Physicochemical Properties of Finger Millet Varieties Grown Under Bako Condition, Oromia, Ethiopia. World J. Food Sci. Technol. 2026, 10(2), 38-46. doi: 10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11
@article{10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11,
author = {Geleta Dereje and Abiyot Lelisa and Megersa Daba and Girma Chemeda},
title = {Effect of Variety and Growing Environments on Some Physicochemical Properties of Finger Millet Varieties Grown Under Bako Condition, Oromia, Ethiopia},
journal = {World Journal of Food Science and Technology},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {38-46},
doi = {10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjfst.20261002.11},
abstract = {Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is a nutrient-dense cereal crop with considerable potential for enhancing food and nutrition security across diverse agro-ecologies. Despite its importance, limited information exists on how varietal differences and growing environments influence its physicochemical properties. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of variety and growing conditions on selected physicochemical attributes of finger millet grown under Bako condition, Oromia, Ethiopia. Field experiments were carried out at Bako and Gute sites using multiple finger millet varieties. Data were analyzed using R statistical software, with analysis of variance (ANOVA) applied to determine significant differences, and mean separation performed at the 5% LSD level. Results revealed that both growing environment and cropping season significantly influenced the physicochemical composition of finger millet. The study identified G×E effects but lacked advanced statistical modeling. Incorporating multivariate approaches such as PCA or clustering would provide deeper insights into varietal differentiation and environmental grouping. Crude protein content ranged from 8.75% (Wama) to 10.85% (Gudatu), crude fat from 1.27% (Gudatu & Wama) to 1.70% (Bareda), and moisture content from 9.06% (Meba) to 10.01% (Diga I). Mineral composition also varied considerably among varieties, with calcium ranging from 277.1 mg/100 g (Bako 09) to 416.2 mg/100 g (Diga-2), magnesium from 158.0 mg/100 g (Diga-1) to 200 mg/100 g (Paddet), phosphorus from 222.5 mg/100 g (Addis 01) to 281.0 mg/100 g (Paddet), and potassium from 335.3 mg/100 g (Addis 01) to 496.5 mg/100 g (Paddet). Finger millet grown at Bako contained higher crude fat, crude fiber, phosphorus, ash, and magnesium, whereas millet grown at Gute exhibited higher crude protein, iron, zinc, calcium, and manganese. Black-seeded varieties consistently outperformed white and brown types in moisture, calcium, and fiber.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Variety and Growing Environments on Some Physicochemical Properties of Finger Millet Varieties Grown Under Bako Condition, Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Geleta Dereje AU - Abiyot Lelisa AU - Megersa Daba AU - Girma Chemeda Y1 - 2026/04/28 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11 DO - 10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11 T2 - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JF - World Journal of Food Science and Technology JO - World Journal of Food Science and Technology SP - 38 EP - 46 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6024 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjfst.20261002.11 AB - Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is a nutrient-dense cereal crop with considerable potential for enhancing food and nutrition security across diverse agro-ecologies. Despite its importance, limited information exists on how varietal differences and growing environments influence its physicochemical properties. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of variety and growing conditions on selected physicochemical attributes of finger millet grown under Bako condition, Oromia, Ethiopia. Field experiments were carried out at Bako and Gute sites using multiple finger millet varieties. Data were analyzed using R statistical software, with analysis of variance (ANOVA) applied to determine significant differences, and mean separation performed at the 5% LSD level. Results revealed that both growing environment and cropping season significantly influenced the physicochemical composition of finger millet. The study identified G×E effects but lacked advanced statistical modeling. Incorporating multivariate approaches such as PCA or clustering would provide deeper insights into varietal differentiation and environmental grouping. Crude protein content ranged from 8.75% (Wama) to 10.85% (Gudatu), crude fat from 1.27% (Gudatu & Wama) to 1.70% (Bareda), and moisture content from 9.06% (Meba) to 10.01% (Diga I). Mineral composition also varied considerably among varieties, with calcium ranging from 277.1 mg/100 g (Bako 09) to 416.2 mg/100 g (Diga-2), magnesium from 158.0 mg/100 g (Diga-1) to 200 mg/100 g (Paddet), phosphorus from 222.5 mg/100 g (Addis 01) to 281.0 mg/100 g (Paddet), and potassium from 335.3 mg/100 g (Addis 01) to 496.5 mg/100 g (Paddet). Finger millet grown at Bako contained higher crude fat, crude fiber, phosphorus, ash, and magnesium, whereas millet grown at Gute exhibited higher crude protein, iron, zinc, calcium, and manganese. Black-seeded varieties consistently outperformed white and brown types in moisture, calcium, and fiber. VL - 10 IS - 2 ER -